Quick Verdict
Both are open source — community support, auditability, and no vendor lock-in.
Pricing
| OpenCode | Gitlawb Zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free (BYO keys) | Free (BYO keys) |
| Open source | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
| Best for | Provider-neutral terminal use | Developers who want full ownership |
Open Source vs Commercial
The open source vs commercial debate matters more for coding agents than most tools because your agent has access to everything.
OpenCode is built for provider-neutral terminal use. It’s open source with Free (BYO keys) pricing. SWE-bench: 88.0%
Gitlawb Zero is built for developers who want full ownership. It’s open source with Free (BYO keys) pricing.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | OpenCode | Gitlawb Zero |
|---|
Pros & Cons
OpenCode
Pros:
- Multi-provider support
- Free and open source
- Skill-driven execution
Cons:
- Archived / no active development
- No vision support
Gitlawb Zero
Pros:
- Full ownership, no vendor lock-in
- Customizable keyboard shortcuts
- Android Termux support
Cons:
- No vision
- No subagents
Verdict
Both are open source — community support, auditability, and no vendor lock-in.
OpenCode is recommended for: Open-source alternative with flexible provider choice Gitlawb Zero is recommended for: Privacy-focused developers who want full control
For a full overview of all 15 agents, see the Complete Guide to AI Coding Agents.