Quick Verdict
Both are open source — community support, auditability, and no vendor lock-in.
Pricing
| Mimo Code | Gitlawb Zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free (BYO keys) | Free (BYO keys) |
| Open source | Yes ✅ | Yes ✅ |
| Best for | Vision-capable OpenCode fork | Developers who want full ownership |
Open Source vs Commercial
The open source vs commercial debate matters more for coding agents than most tools because your agent has access to everything.
Mimo Code is built for vision-capable opencode fork. It’s open source with Free (BYO keys) pricing.
Gitlawb Zero is built for developers who want full ownership. It’s open source with Free (BYO keys) pricing.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Mimo Code | Gitlawb Zero |
|---|
Pros & Cons
Mimo Code
Pros:
- OpenCode fork with vision support
- Reasoning model integration
- Active development
Cons:
- Smaller community than OpenCode
- No subagents
Gitlawb Zero
Pros:
- Full ownership, no vendor lock-in
- Customizable keyboard shortcuts
- Android Termux support
Cons:
- No vision
- No subagents
Verdict
Both are open source — community support, auditability, and no vendor lock-in.
Mimo Code is recommended for: Open-source agent with vision capabilities Gitlawb Zero is recommended for: Privacy-focused developers who want full control
For a full overview of all 15 agents, see the Complete Guide to AI Coding Agents.