Quick Verdict
Cursor has subagents. pi.dev has cron. Your workflow decides the winner.
Pricing
| Cursor | pi.dev | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $20-200/mo | Free (BYO keys) |
| Open source | No ❌ | Yes ✅ |
| Best for | Daily interactive coding | Long-running knowledge-backed agents |
Feature Comparison
Feature lists matter less than which features you actually use. Let’s break down what Cursor and pi.dev actually bring to your terminal.
Cursor is built for daily interactive coding. It’s a commercial product with $20-200/mo pricing. SWE-bench: 91.2%
pi.dev is built for long-running knowledge-backed agents. It’s open source with Free (BYO keys) pricing.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cursor | pi.dev |
|---|
Pros & Cons
Cursor
Pros:
- Best editor experience
- Fast inline editing
- Composer for multi-file
Cons:
- Closed source
- VS Code fork lock-in
pi.dev
Pros:
- Persistent knowledge graphs
- Scheduled tasks
- Background agents
Cons:
- No git integration
- No plugin system
Verdict
Cursor has subagents. pi.dev has cron. Your workflow decides the winner.
Cursor is recommended for: Everyday interactive development and quick edits pi.dev is recommended for: Knowledge-intensive long-running agent tasks
For a full overview of all 15 agents, see the Complete Guide to AI Coding Agents.